#Iran, #MEK and Regime Change Policy
Since the major gathering of the Iranian opposition, MEK in Paris on July 1, the issue of necessity of regime change in Iran has gained traction.
“The only solution to free the people of Iran and establish peace and tranquility in the region, is the overthrow
of the Iranian regime,” declared Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the
Iranian Resistance, in the major gathering of Iranians in Paris on July
1. She reiterated, “The regime’s overthrow is possible and within reach,
and a democratic alternative and organized resistance MEK exists that
can topple it.”
Maryam Rajavi’s call for regime change
in Iran was widely echoed and supported by other prominent U.S. and
European speakers. Among the speakers were former House Speaker Newt
Gingrich and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former U.S.
Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton. All supported MEK ’s call
for regime change in Iran.
Referring to the MEK , Bolton, said: “There is a viable opposition to the rule of the ayatollahs, and that opposition is centered in this room today. I had said for over 10 years since coming to these events, that the declared policy of the United States of America should be … to change the regime itself. And that’s why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!”
Referring to the MEK , Bolton, said: “There is a viable opposition to the rule of the ayatollahs, and that opposition is centered in this room today. I had said for over 10 years since coming to these events, that the declared policy of the United States of America should be … to change the regime itself. And that’s why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!”
After the MEK and Iranian resistance’s
July 1 rally in Paris, Fox News reported, “The Trump administration is
potentially considering seeking a strategy to try to topple the regime.”
The resistance, however, only needs American political and perhaps
economic support to effect “regime change from within.”
As the Iranian regime change notion has
gained momentum by the MEK rally, the Iranian regime is regarding the
issue very serious. Fouad Izadi, an Iranian international expert in an
interview with the state television, admitted to the scope of the new
sanctions and terrorist designation of the Revolutionary Guards in the
US Congress.
In response to the question that what
exactly the Americans are after, Fouad Izadi said, “It doesn’t need any
analysis...Mr. Tillerson said about a month ago in the Foreign Affairs
Committee of the House of Representatives, and a couple of weeks ago Mr.
Mattis in a press conference he had, said, … we want to change the
regime.”
The new bill in the U.S. Congress has added to already shaky regime’s fears. Janati, the head of the Guardian Council announced on Thursday that the main issue which has preoccupied the Supreme leader is his concern over regime change.
The new bill in the U.S. Congress has added to already shaky regime’s fears. Janati, the head of the Guardian Council announced on Thursday that the main issue which has preoccupied the Supreme leader is his concern over regime change.
Iran Lobby attacks against MEK
At the same time the regime’s apologists
and satellite writers in the Western media started their barrage of
fake news and attacks against MEK to foil the regime policy.
The Iranian regime and its lobbies have
consistently worked to paint the MEK as terrorists – with no evidence to
support it – and discredit them in the eyes of the international
community.
For instance, Mehdi Hasan an advocate of
the Iranian extremist regime in the Britain and an Al-Jazeera English
anchorman, could not hide his blind hatred towards MEK. In an article in
Intercept, he levied numerous unfounded and threadbare allegations
against MEK with many of them rebuked in several court of law during
past decade. He also slandered the top politicians for supporting MEK as
a viable force and wrote: “Could it be because of the old, if amoral,
adage that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”? Perhaps. Could it be
the result of ignorance, of senior U.S. figures failing to do due
diligence? Maybe.”
The prominent Washington Free Beacon
introduced Mehdi Hasan as, “a controversial British media figure whom
insiders have billed as a mouthpiece for the Iranian regime. ...praised
Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and publicly branded all non-believers as
mentally ill "animals".
Ali Fallahian, regime’s former
intelligence minister, made shocking remarks in an interview with Aparat
Internet TV, In relation to the massacre of 30,000 MEK prisoners in
1988 he said, “the verdict is death sentence ... Mr. Mousavi (Tabrizi)
who was the Revolution general prosecutor used to say that there is no
need for trial at all ... it makes no sense that we try MEK ... Imam
repeatedly insisted that you should be careful not to let MEK go... Imam
always emphasized that you should always be cautious of this side ...
MEK ruling is always execution. This was his (Khomeini’s) verdict as a
supreme leader, either before this issue of 1988 or afterwards.”
Fallahian said,”Many journalists are the intelligence agents ... A
journalist is not paid well, so he should work with an intelligence
service.” It is hard to believe that Mehdi Hasan is mouthpiece for the
Iranian regime for free, as it is hard to believe that he moderates NIAC
leadership conference or inviting NIAC president Trita Parsi to
Al-Jazeera for free. NIAC of Trita Parsi is widely known as an Iranian
regime’s lobby entity kicked off help of Javad Zarif,
when he was Iran’s Ambassador to the United Nations. Trita Parsi,
another MEK blind foe, unsuccessfully campaigned on behalf of the
Iranian regime to keep MEK in the U.S. list of FTO. Mehdi Hasan and
Trita Parsi are two typical Iran lobbyist stereotyping MEK as cultish
and undemocratic. Obviously, by attacking the MEK and their supporters,
they are trying to induce that the regime has no viable alternative and
to kill any hope or chance for regime change in Iran, which should
happen with the MEK at its core.
Iranian lobby is working hard to show
that regime change policy for Iran is equivalent to war and they have
been successful with some quarters. The New York editorial board on July
20 writes, “Prominent Trump supporters like John Bolton, a former
ambassador to the United Nations; Newt Gingrich, former House speaker;
and Rudolph Giuliani, former New York mayor, are pressing Mr. Trump to
abandon the deal and are speaking out on behalf of the Mujahedeen Khalq,
[MEK] exiled Iranian dissidents who back regime change.” The editorial
concludes, “Trump would make a grave mistake if instead of trying to
work with those moderate forces he led the nation closer to war.”
What is MEK Demand?
What does MEK stands for and is asking the West to do for the regime change in Iran. Is MEK demanding a war against Iran? No!
MEK supports Mrs. Rajavi call during the
July 1, gathering when she said, “Our demands reflect the demands of
Sattar Khan, revered leader of the 1906 Constitutional Revolution, and
Dr. Mohammad Mossadeq, leader of Iran’s Nationalist Movement in 1950s.
As I have reiterated, repeatedly, we want neither money, nor arms. …we
say that the struggle of the people of Iran for regime change is
legitimate, righteous and imperative. We urge you to recognize this
“resistance against oppression.”
Link with Iranian people through MEK
During the July 1 gathering, Judge Mukasy, the 81st Attorney General of the United States in order to get rid of Mullahs, said,
“The best way for both Iranians and non-Iranians to do that is to align
with the Iranian resistance [MEK ] so as to make it clear to the
oppressed citizens of Iran that the world's quarrel is not with Iran but
with the mullahs who have subjugated Iran.” He said MEK members within
Iran “have provided both an example and a tool with their daring
publicity campaign within Iran urging regime change and posting photos
of Mrs Rajavi and slogans opposing the clerical regime. They've been
writing slogans on walls to support this gathering.
For five decades, the MEK has put
themselves at great risks because of their ideals of democracy, freedom
and equality. The Iranian regime has killed 120,000 of dissidents,
including 30,000 political prisoners, during the 1988 massacre, the vast
majority of whom were MEK supporters.
Indeed, regime lobbyists will be out in
force this month but the MEK has the Iranian people and those who
champion for human rights on their side.
No comments:
Post a Comment